Art Outpost: Steven Holl Architects allows art to have autonomy
within a sculptural enclosure in Denmark’s Herning Museum of Contemporary Art.
In museum circles,
curators and artists are well known for kvetching about architects who compete
with the art on view by foisting major design statements onto willing clients.
Small wonder that when Steven Holl entered an invited competition in 2005 for
the Herning Museum of Contemporary Art in central Denmark, he took seriously
the admonition from Holger Reenberg, the director of the museum: “Do everything
you want as long as it doesn’t compromise the art.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4b4d/d4b4df101f75699a1862f7d39268c1102e455870" alt=""+By+Steven+Holl+Architects-Photo+%C2%A9+Iwan+Baan+-01.jpg)
Holl’s abstractly conceived,
60,278-square-foot structure leaves alone the art galleries totaling 15,812
square feet. Two discrete precast-concrete volumes form the inner core of the
museum, one for permanent exhibitions, the other for temporary ones, and
movable walls of lightweight construction allow art to be displayed in
orthogonally arranged spaces.
The architectural whammy occurs above the hang,
so to speak. Here the roof fills out the gestalt, with five white tubular
shells bending and twisting to create convex ceilings that billow over the
galleries and perimeter areas containing the lobby, bookshop, offices, café,
library, and an auditorium for concerts. On the exterior, convex and concave
walls echo in the elevation the curves overhead. Although the exterior white
walls, made of poured-in-place reinforced concrete, seem rather blank from
afar, up close you find the surface rutted with creases. To achieve this
thickly textured effect, the architects had trucks drive over vinyl mesh tarp,
then staple-gunned the wrinkled material to plywood forms for the pour. When
the concrete dried and the tarp was yanked off, “you had wrinkles with no
repetition,” says Holl.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e713/8e71328ab41ccb2df0f9d412bbe5d2dcb2b20031" alt=""+By+Steven+Holl+Architects-Photo+%C2%A9+Iwan+Baan+-08.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5667a/5667a9571a39bfccc3eb4f8a2225427e7fc74995" alt=""+By+Steven+Holl+Architects-Photo+%C2%A9+Iwan+Baan+-09.jpg)
In spite of the visual
resemblance of the roof to shirt sleeves, Holl shrugs off the catchy
provenance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff425/ff42522ca22443fcece5bbfc710a1abbcf6a0af5" alt=""
The imaginative intersection of
art, light, and architecture offers a fittingly dramatic setting for the
exhibitions, and not surprisingly, the museum recently received one of the
Royal Institute of British Architects’ International Architecture awards for
2010. But nothing is perfect — or at least certain aspects need to be addressed
in such an innovative project. For example, the clerestories often have been
blacked out with shades since the opening last fall, owing to curatorial
concern about daylight levels for the paintings. Visitors (including this
observer) have found the entrance not legible enough as a portal to the museum,
and Reenberg notes it is hard to tell if the museum is open, since no parking
is permitted in front. While the interior circulation through the galleries is
clear, and the outdoor piazza welcoming, visitors may not be as easily drawn to
walk around the entire exterior of the building, partly because concave walls
don’t inflect one’s steps around a corner. (Admittedly, cold weather often
dampens such a desire.) Essentially, the integration of the building and land is
a visual one best seen from the air, not a kinesthetic one experienced on foot.
Here, the interaction of the pedestrian with the art inside the museum takes
precedence.
No comments:
Post a Comment