An elegantly powerful structure reflects its dramatic natural setting and the mission of the institution housed within.
From the first glimpse of the $103 million Natural History Museum of Utah in Salt Lake City, the metaphor is unambiguous: The 163,000-square-foot building is both literally and figuratively rooted in the landscape. The terraced structure is anchored into its sloping site at the edge of the University of Utah campus, a few miles from downtown, while the folded and subtly canted exterior walls mimic the scrubby hillside rising behind it. But even though the references to its environment are readily recognizable, the museum holds its own as man-made object against the rugged backdrop. It is an interpretation and abstraction of nature rather than a facsimile, explains Todd Schliemann, partner at New York–based Ennead Achitects (formerly Polshek Partnership), which designed the building in association with local firm, GSBS.
The museum, which opened in
November, moved from a decaying, Depression-era building in the heart of the
campus to its current 17-acre site—one that appears to be the threshold of
unspoiled wilderness. But although the land had never been developed for a
building, it was not pristine. In the early 1900s, it had been marred when
soldiers from nearby Fort Douglas used it as a firing range. More recently,
major utility lines were routed through the property, along with a trailhead
for a mountain-biking and hiking path.
The designers have integrated
this infrastructure with the site by realigning and redefining the trailhead
with gabion walls whose rock was uncovered during foundation excavation, and by
camouflaging the utilities with sculptural landforms. They configured the new
building as a three-bar form that steps up with the terrain. Its structure,
which combines concrete shear walls and steel framing, is organized into two
wings—one that supports the museum's “empirical” activities, including research,
conservation, and administration; and an “interpretive” wing that houses the
exhibits, says Schliemann.
The glue between the two
programmatic halves, and the museum's centerpiece, is a 60-foot-tall lobby that
doubles as a space for lectures and parties. It is enclosed by soft, gray
board-formed concrete, warm, white-faceted drywall planes, and one glazed wall
that offers sweeping views out over the city and across Salt Lake Valley. Even
visitors who are unaware that this grand room has been dubbed the “canyon” will
immediately understand that its form, like that of the building's exterior, has
been inspired by the regional landscape. But the space can be appreciated
without knowledge of its origins, since it elicits an immediate (and positive)
emotional response. “We wanted an inspirational space that would be viscerally
remembered,” says Schliemann. “It's a cathedral with a view.”
The simile of
architecture-as-geological-formation extends to the building's exterior
envelope, where horizontal standing-seam copper—mined on the opposite side of
the valley and donated by the mine's parent company—covers the angular walls
above the a poured-in-place concrete base. The cladding, made of three
different alloys, takes on a varied patina, creating an effect similar to the
striations of exposed rock cliffs. Although this skin is now different shades
of brown with hints of green, its colors will continue to evolve, much like the
landscape around the building where Gambel oaks, two types of maples, native
sumac, and an understory of several varieties of brush, have been planted. In
the autumn the foliage will turn nutty brown, vibrant orange, and red.
The route through the exhibits,
which were designed by New York-based Ralph Appelbaum Associates, also takes
its cues from the natural environment. Ramped walkways with ipé-plank decks and
glass balustrades trace a gently ascending course that winds through the
museum's 10 thematic galleries in the manner of a mountain traverse. The path
leads from the lowest level displays, which showcase the region's plant and
animal life over 225 million years, to the uppermost exhibition space, which
focuses on the traditions of Utah's native peoples. Along the way, visitors can
examine artifacts from the museum's collection of 1.2 million objects,
including paleontological, archaeological, and mineralogical specimens. But
museumgoers need not view the galleries in any particular order or follow a
prescribed course, according to Sarah George, executive director. Instead, they
can get off the elevator on any level, cross one of the bridges spanning the
canyon, and explore just one section of the museum. “It was important to us
that visitors be able to chose their own path,” she says.
The galleries are primarily
inwardly focused, with few windows in order to protect the collections from
damaging ultraviolet light. However, in a select number of carefully
orchestrated locations, windows are included so that museumgoers can make
connections between the displays and the world outside. For example, an exhibit
exploring the evolution of the Great Salt Lake is positioned next to a window
that offers views of the actual body of water off in the distance.
The small number of windows—and
the resulting low-window-to-wall ratio—helps improve the building's energy
performance and is one of several strategies that have put the project on track
for LEED Gold certification. (For more on the envelope, see Performance
Puzzle) But because site constraints dictated that most of the
openings face west—an undesirable orientation from both heat-gain and
conservation perspectives—the high-performance glazing includes a frit and a
low-e coating. Although the treatment somewhat obscures the view of the
museum's interior from its outdoor terraces, the effect enhances the building:
The glazing mirrors the sky and the museum's environs, providing another
reminder that the mission of the institution beyond the glass and the copper-clad
walls is to reflect and interpret the natural world.
Location: Salt Lake City
Completion
Date: October
2011
Total
Project cost: $103
Million
Owner: State of Utah
Architect: Ennead Architects
No comments:
Post a Comment