Coop Himmelb(l)au’s eclectic design for High School #9 in Los
Angeles is ambitious. But does it succeed?
High School #9
commandeers your attention, even as you’re zooming along the Hollywood Freeway
in central Los Angeles. Ringed by a roller-coastering ramp, the school’s tower
comes into view, a triangle topped by a cantilevered box, like a beach ball
balanced on a seal’s nose. Just as Encounter, the futuristic “spaceship”
restaurant at the city’s gateway airport, announces the local tone, the
school’s dynamic 140-foot-high sentinel has immediate “only in L.A.!” impact.
But this landmark’s high visibility and iconic exuberance also make it an
unexpectedly complex symbol: a lightning rod for controversy.
The bottom line is HS #9’s
final price tag: $232 million for 230,000 square feet (completely fitted out),
widely translated as a stunning $1,000 per square foot (though construction and
landscaping costs of $171.9 million bring it closer to $745 per square foot).
Meanwhile, the project’s most publicly recognized element, the tower, remains
an empty shell, pending uncertain completion of its spectacular room at the
top. So, for now, this component is purely symbolic, a billboard along the
freeway, entangled in a disconnected ramp to nowhere, configured whimsically as
an unraveled number 9. And that’s just one piece of an ambitious,
unconventional, and eclectically expressive design, making it awfully easy to
fault the architecture. But for all its quirks—and the challenge of separating
this architecture from the complicated forces behind it—the design has much to
commend.
The scheme, by Coop
Himmelb(l)au, is often likened to torqued chess pieces—with a tilted, conical,
freestanding library, clad in gleaming steel; rhomboid light chimneys
projecting from the cafeteria; and blocky classroom buildings, punched with
oversize portholes. But the project also bears the thumbprints of unremarkable
beginnings.
In 2000, the notoriously
overcrowded and under-resourced Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD),
with unprecedented bond funding, engaged AC Martin Architects to design a
traditional high school for the 9.8-acre downtown site, formerly LAUSD
headquarters. By 2001, AC Martin’s scheme was, according to Coop Himmelb(l)au,
“fully designed and engineered through construction documents.” Yet billionaire
philanthropist Eli Broad, with other local leaders, convinced the district to
switch course and create instead a high school composed of four “academies”:
music, theater, dance, and visual arts. The idea was to exploit the educational
opportunities of the site, bordering inner city and Grand Avenue’s cultural
district, along with Gehry’s Disney Hall, Isozaki’s Los Angeles Museum of
Contemporary Art, and Moneo’s Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels. Instrumental
to Disney Hall’s realization and the future Grand Avenue Development, Broad
wanted an architectural luminary (and later contributed $5 million) for HS #9.
An international competition
ensued, won by Coop Himmelb(l)au. The firm’s approach emphasized “the
importance of making icons people could identify and take ‘mental ownership’
of,” says principal architect Wolf D. Prix, who faults architectural anonymity
for the assault on buildings during Paris’s 1968 student uprisings and L.A.’s
Rodney King riots. “We needed to create something exceptional and memorable in
the anonymous fabric of the city.” Hence the school’s spiraling, Tatlinesque
tower, forming an urban gateway with the cathedral campanile directly across
the freeway. Beneath the tower, a 950-seat, state-of-the-art theater—an
ambitious piece of the revised program—anchors a corner with a glassy public
lobby.
But budgetary guidelines kept
certain straightforward AC Martin elements in place: a central rectangular
plaza and the boxy massing of classroom buildings, tweaked by Coop Himmelb(l)au
with big, round, playful (verging on silly) windows bubbling across the street
facades. These blocky volumes, each housing a separate “academy,” have become
successful foils to the quirkier structures, much as Le Corbusier’s Chandigarh
Secretariat plays rectilinearity against a roofscape of similar objects.
Set on a hill, HS #9’s campus
rises from wide entry steps, originally envisioned as a community perch. But
LAUSD mandates, introduced late in the game, resulted in security gates at the
stair’s base (rather than its summit), awkwardly severing it from the public
realm. The steps lead to the campus’s protected center, its outdoor meeting
ground and crossroads, with access to the library cone, cafeteria (burrowed in
the hill), classrooms, and theater—a strikingly surreal landscape of silvery
objects amid downtown skylines. Amphitheater steps ascend to the gym and soccer
field–cum–open-air arts space.
A secure precinct, locked
during classes like any LAUSD school, the campus conveys a remarkable sense of
freedom and spatial expanse. “My kids are so excited to study here,” reports
one parent (echoed by students across the Internet). “It makes them feel
special—they keep saying, ‘Wow, this is like college!’ ”
Despite the gates, HS #9 is not
elitist, accepting 70 percent of its 1,700 students from its inner-city
neighborhood. And, unlike high-powered arts high schools, it does not base
admissions on auditions or portfolios. Yet the facilities and fittings—from
cutting-edge theater technologies to music synthesizers—would be the envy of
most college and professional arts venues. And that’s where the school’s
dazzling cost and architectural expression reenter the discussion.
True, the price owes much to
unfortunate timing and unforeseen obstacles: an overheated economy, multiple
LAUSD leadership changes, and a site complicated by archaeological findings and
a defunct rail tunnel. But even so, in a school system plagued by impoverished
facilities, does it ever make sense, vis-à-vis cost and image, to splurge on a
flagship? (AC Martin’s more typical, no-frills scheme was estimated at a third
of HS #9’s final cost.) Though hardly the architect’s call, this question touches
on the choice of designer and matters of perception. LAUSD might have been
prudent to select an architect known for inventive yet legible economy of
means, even when cost-efficient Coop Himmelb(l)au’s exuberant form-making
rarely conveys that message. (And an idiosyncratic, partially cantilevered
tower over a theater’s column-free space undeniably boosts the price.)
Some critics have portrayed the
project as a showpiece emphasizing exterior public image over student
experience. But quiet, minimally distracting spaces have their value here.
Though the wide corridors between classrooms are standardized, their simple
ingredients shine: good proportions, daylight, and authenticity of materials,
including handsomely durable polished-concrete floors and galvanized-aluminum
balustrades. And here, straightforward classrooms gain unexpected variety and
luminosity through multiple sizes and positions of portholes.
Halfway into HS #9’s first
year, the jury is still out on its success. Mirroring student feedback across the
Internet, one blogger wrote: “For those who keep asking what the big spiral is
for, if that even matters, it’s to show art students we have to reach for
success, soar to new heights. This place is great.” “Dayum!” another added.
It’s only a pity the tower-top
theater reception room, with dramatic views, remains vacant. The school
deferred completion to trim costs, despite its earning potential as a rental
event space. But HS #9’s surreal architecture has inspired another revenue
stream—as a top movie and TV shooting location. “It’s exciting,” says assistant
principal Ken Martinez, “but we only do it if it’s not distracting. Remember:
Our first priority is the students.”
No comments:
Post a Comment