References: greatbuildings.com, rochesterunitarian.org, archinform.net
Louis Kahn was
known for his infusion of culture and creating a sense of place within modern
architecture. Although it may not be as well known as some of his other
projects around the world, the First Unitarian Church in Rochester, New York is one of Kahn’s most
impressive works. Completed slightly after the Salk Institute in 1967, it
replaced their previous church that was designed by Richard Upjohn, founder of
the AIA, which was demolished during urban redevelopment in Rochester.
The First Unitarian Church combines modern design aesthetic with traditional Unitarian values that promotes community and unites everyone at the heart of the building, the sanctuary. When Kahn initially started meeting with members of the congregation, the pastor had described the Unitarian Church and its aspirations of rationalism, free will and thought, and the coexistence of science and religion. These meetings resulted in Kahn beginning to sketch on a chalkboard where he conceptually organized the church’s supporting spaces around a central question mark. In his eyes, the question mark symbolized the sanctuary where all the questioning would occur. It is a critical look at religion and the journey that one must embark on to find truth; questioning as the natural process.
In the spaces around the
sanctuary Kahn situated classrooms for the school; these classrooms were what
Kahn considered to be the origin from which the questions of Unitarianism were
raised. The classrooms and sanctuary are bridged by an ambulatory that
wraps around the sanctuary where conceptually all methods of thought and belief
of the Unitarian church converge to thus be confronted and unearthed. It’s a
theological architectural promenade of learning, thought, questioning, and
discovery.
The First Unitarian Church,
similar to all of Kahn’s projects, is of monumental quality; the church and
school take on a dominant stance in Rochester. Kahn’s implementation of brick
and cast-in place concrete gives the buildings a massive presence, but the
heavy, monumental design presents issues on lighting the interior spaces,
especially in places of worship.
Since the classrooms are
oriented around the perimeter of the building, there is a sense of regularity
by the way in which Kahn approaches lighting the classrooms. The façade
has extruded window wells that filter the light within the classrooms. Each
extrusion creates small seating spaces for the children within. With the
sanctuary being in the center of the building, directing natural light into the
space is quite difficult. However, Kahn design four light towers that are
situated at each corner of the sanctuary. The towers act as filters that
saturate the sanctuary throughout the day constantly changing the perceptive
qualities of the space even as the seasons change.
In all of
Kahn’s architecture, light has always been a main component of design, but the
way he approached lighting the sanctuary interior complimented and provoked the
expressive material qualities of the space. Kahn’s implementation of
simple materials that do not require any extra detailing after their
construction added to the atmosphere and character of the spaces ; he believe
in the integrity of each material so much so that the cast-in place concrete
would take on the formal qualities of the wood planks.
The unfinished aesthetic
seems to dematerialize the qualities of each space giving the spaces a new
aesthetic found among the details and the light. In the sanctuary, the
rough finish of the cast-in place concrete and the brick interior appear to
wash away in the light, giving the light deconstructive properties, all the
while giving the material luminous qualities that engulf and transform the
space. Even though the First Unitarian Church is not one of Kahn’s
more famous buildings, it is just as impressive and spatially intriguing.
From the design concept to the design of natural lighting systems are
trademarks of Kahn’s architecture. The First Unitarian Church is one
Kahn’s finest examples of how architecture can have transformative effects, not
simply with light or design, but the theoretical understanding and
restructuring of the use of space.
No comments:
Post a Comment