Vitruvian proportion
Vitruvius
described as the principal source of proportion among the orders the proportion
of the human figure. .
According to Leonardo's notes in the
accompanying text, written in mirror writing, it was made as a study of the
proportions of the (male) human body as described in a treatise by the Ancient Roman architect Vitruvius, who wrote that in the human body:
·
a palm is the width of four fingers or
three inches
·
a foot is the width of four palms and is
36 fingers or 12 inches
·
a cubit
is the width of six palms
·
a man's height is four cubits and 24
palms
·
a pace is four cubits or five feet
·
the length of a man's outspread arms
is equal to his height
·
the distance from the hairline to
the bottom of the chin is one-tenth of a man's height
·
the distance from the top of the
head to the bottom of the chin is one-eighth of a man's height
·
the maximum width of the shoulders
is a quarter of a man's height
·
the distance from the elbow to the
tip of the hand is one-fifth of a man's height
·
the distance from the elbow to the
armpit is one-eighth of a man's height
·
the length of the hand is one-tenth
of a man's height
·
the distance from the bottom of the
chin to the nose is one-third of the length of the head
·
the distance from the hairline to
the eyebrows is one-third of the length of the face
·
the length of the ear is one-third
of the length of the face
Leonardo is clearly illustrating
Vitruvius' De architectura
3.1.3 which reads:
The navel is naturally placed in the centre of the human
body, and, if in a man lying with his face upward, and his hands and feet
extended, from his navel as the centre, a circle be described, it will touch
his fingers and toes. It is not alone by a circle, that the human body is thus
circumscribed, as may be seen by placing it within a square. For measuring from
the feet to the crown of the head, and then across the arms fully extended, we
find the latter measure equal to the former; so that lines at right angles to
each other, enclosing the figure, will form a square.
Though
he was certainly aware of the work of Pythagoras, it does not appear that he
took the harmonic divisions of the octave as being relevant to the
disposition of form, preferring simpler whole-number ratios to describe
proportions. However, beyond the writings of Vitruvius, it seems likely that
the ancient Greeks and Romans would occasionally use proportions derived from
the golden ratio (most famously, in the Parthenon of Athens), and the
Pythagorean divisions of the octave. These are found in the Rhynd papyrus 16.
Care should be taken in reading too much into this, however, while simple
geometric transformations can quite readily produce these proportions, the Egyptian
were quite good at expressing arithmetic and geometric series as unit fractions.
While, it is possible that the originators of the design may not have been
aware of the particular proportions they were generating as they worked, it's
more likely that the methods of construction using diagonals and curves would
have taught them something.
The
Biblical proportions of Solomons temple
caught the attention of both architects and scientists, who from a very early
time began incorporating them into the architecture of cathedrals
and other sacred geometry.
Regarding
the Pythagorean divisions of the octave mentioned above, these are a set of
whole number ratios (based on core ratios of 1:2 (octave), 2:3 (fifth) and 3:4
(fourth)) which form the Pythagorean tuning. These proportions were thought to have a recognisable
harmonic significance, regardless of whether they were perceived visually or
auditorially, reflecting the Pythagorean idea that all things were numbers.
The
Renaissance tried to extract and codify the system of proportions in the orders
as used by the ancients, believing that with analysis a mathematically absolute
ideal of beauty would emerge. Brunelleschi in particular studied interactions of perspective with the
perception of proportion (as understood by the ancients). This focus on the
perception of harmony was somewhat of a break from the Pythagorean ideal of
numbers controlling all things.
Leonardo
da Vinci's Vitruvian Man is an example of a Renaissance codification of the
Vitruvian view of the proportions of man. Divina proportione took the idea of
the golden ratio and introduced it to the Renaissance architects. Both Palladio
and Alberti produced proportional systems for classically-based
architecture.
Alberti's
system was based on the Pythagorean divisions of the octave. It grouped the
small whole-number proportions into 3 groups, short (1:1, 2:3, 3:4), medium
(1:2, 4:9, 9:16) and long (1:3, 3:8, 1:4).
Palladio's
system was based on similar proportions with the addition of the square root of
2 into the mix. 1:1, 1:1.414..., 3:4, 2:3, 3:5.
The
work of de Chambray, Desgodetz
and Perrault eventually demonstrated that classical buildings had
reference to standards of proportion that came directly from the original sense
of the word geometry, the measure of the earth and its division into degrees,
miles, stadia, cords, rods, paces, yards, feet, hands, palms and fingers
Based
on apparently arbitrary proportions of an "ideal man" (possibly Le Corbusier
himself) combined with the golden ratio
and Vitruvian Man, Le Modulor was never popularly adopted among architects, but the
system's graphic of the stylised man with one upraised arm is widely recognised
and powerful. The modulor is not well suited to introduce proportion and
pattern into architecture (Langhein, 2005), to improve its form qualities
(gestalt pragnance) and introduce shape grammar in design in building.